Hi everyone! We're hard at work trying to keep our community clean, so if you see any spam, please report it here and we'll review ASAP!  Thanks a million!
8,819 Users Online
  • 640,129,772 Downloads
  • 1,696,349 Wallpapers
  • 1,565,068 Members
  • 12,971,712 Votes
  • 5,965,287 Favorites

Lennahagarty
Login to Become a Fan
 
ProfileWallpapers (0)Favorites (0)Journal (154)DiscussionContact Member
Journal for LennahagartyJournal for Lennahagarty
Jul
7
Happy
An scrutiny of some 134 biorhythm muse found that Bio Rhythm Review the hypothesis, speculation is not weighty (Hines, 1998). It is empirically testable and has been shown to be false. Terence Hines suppose that this performance mean that biorhythm theory \'can not be suitably termed a pseudoscientific hypothesis, speculation\'. However, when the counselor of an empirically testable theory rejected to give up the speculation in the presence of irresistible demonstration against it, it seems tolerable to call the theory pseudoscientific. For, in actuality, the adherents to such a theory have stated by their behaviour that there is nothing that could confute it, yet they go on to claim the theory is scientific. (from Carroll\'s "The Skeptic\'s Dictionary")

https://ultrafitnessmail.com/bio-rhythm-review/
Times Viewed: 17Bookmark and Share
0 responses have been posted to this journal entry. Post Your Response!
Advertisement
Previous Journal Entry
Next Journal Entry

Recently Spotted Members


No members found. Be the first.